Assessment · 15 minutes · USER.md
You've set up Claude Code, Cursor, or OpenClaw carefully. You've wired MCPs. You've written prompts. But when you ask anything personal, it treats you like any other user — because no one ever introduced you.
The problem
Most users never configure the user context file — or fill it with three generic lines like "I'm a developer, I speak English." The result: impersonal answers, off-the-mark recommendations, and that frustrating feeling that the AI doesn't get how you work.
Help me decide between two job offers.
Without context, the AI dumps a generic list of 20 criteria. With your USER.md, it already knows you decide fast, value autonomy, and hate long lists — so it gives you 3 clean options and a recommendation.
Structure this presentation for me.
Without context, you get a generic 15-slide template. With your USER.md, it knows whether you lead with vision or data, whether you prefer bullets or prose, and whether your audience is your cofounder or an investor.
How do I respond to this email from my boss?
Without context, it gives you a standard diplomatic reply. With your USER.md, it knows you value direct honesty over pleasantries, and adjusts the tone accordingly.
Straight from your agent
When you ask me for a recommendation, I don't know if you want three options with trade-offs or a list of fifteen considerations. I don't know if you decide by logic or by impact on people. I don't know if you prefer me to be direct or diplomatic. So I respond in the tone of the average — and the average is not you.
Without USER.md
The agent assumes the average profile. Delivers text that's technically correct but doesn't sound like it was made for you.
With USER.md
The agent knows how you think, decide, and communicate. Every answer is tuned to your real profile — not to no one's profile.
The difference
The agent's intelligence is the same. What changes is the calibration. It's the difference between a brilliant consultant who has known you for 5 years and one who is on their first day.
ConhecerTe generates this context from a behavioral assessment grounded in three theories with decades of scientific validation — DISC (Marston, 1928), Psychological Types (Jung, 1921), and Value Hierarchy (Spranger, 1914). It's not what you think you are. It's what your response patterns reveal about how you actually operate.
How it works
No lengthy signup, no psychological jargon, no "right answers." You answer, see the preview, unlock the full report whenever you want.
15 minutes. 100 questions designed from three proven theories. Zero jargon, no "right or wrong" answers. Pause and resume whenever you want — your progress is saved.
The moment you finish, you get a free glimpse of your behavioral profile on screen. No payment required yet. If it resonates, you unlock the full report.
$19 unlocks the full PDF report and your ready-to-paste USER.md. On the spot. One click, and your Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT have just been introduced to you.
The difference
The question is identical. What changes is what the agent knows about you.
You ask
"I'm torn between launching my product in 30 days or waiting another 60 to polish it. What do you think?"
"That's an important decision! Let me list the pros and cons of each option for you to evaluate."
Pros of launching in 30 days: real feedback, market validation, iteration time…
Pros of waiting 60 days: more mature product, better first impression, fewer public bugs…
"Consider your personal context, available resources, risk tolerance, stakeholder feedback…"
(12 paragraphs later, it concludes with "the decision is yours.")
Launch in 30. With your profile, 60 days becomes 90, and you lose momentum.
Real trade-off: you'll learn 5× more from real bugs than from internal polish.
If you want to de-risk, soft-launch to 10 users in week 4 before going public.
The difference isn't the model's intelligence. It's that it knows who you are.
What's included
Base Plan
One-time payment · No subscription
For people who want an agent that understands how they operate.
Base + Plus
One-time payment · No subscription
For people who want to go beyond self-knowledge and turn it into practical direction.
And more
Stripe checkout · Pix or card · 7-day money-back
Anonymized preview
A well-crafted USER.md isn't a résumé. It's a user manual for how you think. Here's an anonymized excerpt of the kind of file you'll get — ready to paste into your agent's workspace.
# USER.md## Identity- Preferred address: Marina- Preferred language: en## How I think- I see the whole before the parts. Give me context first, details on demand.- I decide fast and commit. I'd rather course-correct mid-flight than delay takeoff.- I think out loud. Bouncing an idea with someone is how I process it.## How to serve me well### Do this- Lead with the conclusion. Then 2–3 options with trade-offs. Then your recommendation.- Compensate for my detail blindness — hand me structured output to approve,not blank templates to fill.- When I'm about to overcommit, name it plainly.### Don't do this- Don't bury the recommendation at the end.- Don't hand me raw data without interpretation.- Don't moralize about pace or rest unless I ask.## My blind spots- I underestimate execution time on new projects (~40% average error).- I tend to close decisions too early when I'm excited.# ... continues for 7 more sections ...
Foundation
ConhecerTe didn't invent a new theory of personality. We apply three classical and complementary lenses — each measuring a different dimension of your behavior.
Chapter I · 1928
"How people respond to challenges, other people, pace, and rules."
William Marston was a lawyer and Harvard-trained psychologist. In Emotions of Normal People, he proposed four factors — Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. We measure all four.
Chapter II · 1921
"Three axes: energy, perception, and judgment."
Carl Jung split psychological types across three axes: where you direct your energy (outward or inward), how you take in information (through the senses or intuition), and how you decide (by logic or by value). We measure all three.
Chapter III · 1914
"Six fundamental values orient every human decision."
Eduard Spranger identified six values that orient decisions: Theoretical, Economic, Aesthetic, Social, Political, and Transcendent. We measure all six and compute your personal hierarchy.
Alone, each one offers a partial reading. Together, they reveal patterns no single lens catches. That's where the value of ConhecerTe lives.
If your USER.md doesn't visibly improve your agent's answers within 30 minutes of real use, you get a full refund within 7 days.
No endless form. No justification needed. Just send us an email.
Plus: if the result doesn't reflect who you are, we redo the assessment on us.Starts in 15 minutes
One assessment. One file. And your Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT start responding like someone who's worked with you for years — not a generic bot.
Start now — $19 →Pix or card · 7-day money-back · Invoice included